<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>US Pakistan Military relations Archives - Politact</title>
	<atom:link href="https://politact.com/tag/us-pakistan-military-relations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://politact.com/tag/us-pakistan-military-relations/</link>
	<description>Futurist Advisory Firm - Developing multidimensional strategic insights 2 increasingly asymmetric global political, security, and economic realities</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2016 11:57:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>The Concerns Over Advancing Chinese Military Capabilities</title>
		<link>https://politact.com/the-concerns-over-advancing-chinese-military-capabilities/</link>
					<comments>https://politact.com/the-concerns-over-advancing-chinese-military-capabilities/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Analysis of Perception and Perspective]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghan Conflict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AfPak policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti aircraft carrier cruise missiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Balance of power in Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BRIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FATA situation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future of Air and Space Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future of drone technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geopolitical situation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geopolitical situation of South Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Bidens visit to Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest Military weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military innovations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stealth technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Threat perceptions of Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[threat perceptions of US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Threat Percpetions of China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US and Asia Pacific]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US China Military relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US India relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Pakistan Military relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Pakistan relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Russia relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US withdrawal from Afghanistan]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/politact1/the-concerns-over-advancing-chinese-military-capabilities/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><img width="200" height="112" src="https://politact.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/200_Chinese_Stealth_Fighter_J-20.jpg" class="attachment-large size-large wp-post-image" alt="" style="float:left; margin:0 15px 15px 0;" decoding="async" />Context As Vice President Joe Biden arrives in Pakistan and US Secretary of Defense continues his three-day visit to China, the Chinese have recently disclosed two sophisticated weapons that can threaten key capabilities of US and its allies in the future. &#160; Analaysis The two recently revealed Chinese weapons include the J-20 stealth fighter jet [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://politact.com/the-concerns-over-advancing-chinese-military-capabilities/">The Concerns Over Advancing Chinese Military Capabilities</a> appeared first on <a href="https://politact.com">Politact</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="200" height="112" src="https://politact.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/200_Chinese_Stealth_Fighter_J-20.jpg" class="attachment-large size-large wp-post-image" alt="" style="float:left; margin:0 15px 15px 0;" decoding="async" /><p><strong>Context</strong></p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="size-full wp-image-3026 alignleft" src="https://beta.politact.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/200_Chinese_Stealth_Fighter_J-20.jpg" alt="200_Chinese_Stealth_Fighter_J-20" width="200" height="112" />As Vice President Joe Biden arrives in Pakistan and US Secretary of Defense continues his three-day visit to China, the Chinese have recently disclosed two sophisticated weapons that can threaten key capabilities of US and its allies in the future.</p>
<p><span id="more-1680"></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>Analaysis</strong></p>
<p>The two recently revealed Chinese weapons include the J-20 stealth fighter jet prototype and Dong Feng 21D anti-aircraft carrier missiles. Experts believe the development of defense systems such as an aircraft-carrier ballistic missile, anti-satellite weapons and stealth fighter, pose a threat to the United States and its allies. No doubt these capabilities would be particularly worrisome for India. Meanwhile, India has also made recent overtures reflecting that it does not necessarily endorse &#8216;One-China&#8217; policy.</p>
<p>Chinese officials have claimed that the test flight of J-20 stealth fighter as US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates is visiting China, was a mere coincidence.</p>
<p>&#8220;I asked President Hu about it directly, and he said that the test had absolutely nothing to do with my visit and had been a pre-planned test. And that&#8217;s where we left it,&#8221; Mr. Gates was quoted as saying by Reuters news agency.</p>
<p>Pentagon has downplayed the importance of these weapons:</p>
<p>&#8220;Developing a stealth capability with a prototype and then integrating that into a combat environment is going to take some time,&#8221; said US director of naval intelligence Vice Admiral David Dorsett.</p>
<p>On the other hand, Chinese Minister of Defense Liang Guanglie made the following comments countering US and western apprehensions:</p>
<p>&#8220;We cannot call ourselves an advanced military country,&#8221; Liang told reporters. &#8220;The gap between us and advanced countries is at least two to three decades.&#8221;</p>
<p>United States wants to engage China in a comprehensive dialogue to gauge its strategic intent and to avoid potential mishaps, the possibility of which exists in the tense Korean Peninsula. China&#8217;s defense budget escalated between 1999 and 2009 and is reported to be at $78bn in 2010, while US has the world&#8217;s largest military budget at around $700bn.</p>
<p>Before suspending military to military dialogue, China had laid down three conditions to improve relations between US and China:</p>
<ul>
<li>Cease weapons sales to Taiwan.</li>
<li>Stop its naval and air-based surveillance activities off China&#8217;s coast.</li>
<li>Eliminate laws that prevent U.S. interaction with China&#8217;s military.</li>
</ul>
<p>There are no signs that these terms were met and Chinese seem to have shifted the onus of improving relations to the US. As noted in previous evaluations, the US-China relations have far reaching implications for Pakistan and India. PoliTact has noted that if the military to military, or political and economic relations, between US and China deteriorate, it would likely impact US-Pakistan relations negatively.</p>
<p>Pakistan is a strong ally of China and key partner of US, whose role is pivotal to the resolution of Afghan conflict. However, the public perception of US in Pakistan has dipped to such an extent that it has become difficult for the government to carryout any policies that appear to be connected to American interests. In this context, Vice President Joe Biden&#8217;s visit to Pakistan has taken on added significance.</p>
<p><strong>Tell Us What You Think</strong><br />
<a>Feedback@politact.com</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://politact.com/the-concerns-over-advancing-chinese-military-capabilities/">The Concerns Over Advancing Chinese Military Capabilities</a> appeared first on <a href="https://politact.com">Politact</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://politact.com/the-concerns-over-advancing-chinese-military-capabilities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>US-India Dialogue: India&#8217;s Concerns Over The US-Pakistan Cooperation</title>
		<link>https://politact.com/us-india-dialogue-indias-concerns-over-the-us-pakistan-cooperation/</link>
					<comments>https://politact.com/us-india-dialogue-indias-concerns-over-the-us-pakistan-cooperation/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Churchil Picket Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghan Army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghan Conflict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghan Taliban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AfPak policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy in Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extremism in FATA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FATA situation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy of India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy of Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy of US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future of extremism in Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future of South Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India US relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indus water treaty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Waziristan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan Army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Afghanistan relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US China relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US India Defense cooperation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Pakistan Military relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Pakistan strategic talks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water Wars]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/politact1/us-india-dialogue-indias-concerns-over-the-us-pakistan-cooperation/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p><img width="200" height="200" src="https://politact.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/200_India_and_Pakistan.jpg" class="attachment-large size-large wp-post-image" alt="" style="float:left; margin:0 15px 15px 0;" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://politact.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/200_India_and_Pakistan.jpg 200w, https://politact.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/200_India_and_Pakistan-100x100.jpg 100w, https://politact.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/200_India_and_Pakistan-150x150.jpg 150w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 200px) 100vw, 200px" />Context Faced with a challenging prospect in AfPak region, the US has initiated an intricate dialog process with the three key parties, which are distrustful of each other and the US. The US-Pakistan talks were held in March, followed by US-Afghanistan dialogue in May, and now this week comes the US-India strategic discussion. To balance [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://politact.com/us-india-dialogue-indias-concerns-over-the-us-pakistan-cooperation/">US-India Dialogue: India&#8217;s Concerns Over The US-Pakistan Cooperation</a> appeared first on <a href="https://politact.com">Politact</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="200" height="200" src="https://politact.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/200_India_and_Pakistan.jpg" class="attachment-large size-large wp-post-image" alt="" style="float:left; margin:0 15px 15px 0;" decoding="async" loading="lazy" srcset="https://politact.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/200_India_and_Pakistan.jpg 200w, https://politact.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/200_India_and_Pakistan-100x100.jpg 100w, https://politact.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/200_India_and_Pakistan-150x150.jpg 150w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 200px) 100vw, 200px" /><p><strong>Context</strong><br />
<img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignright" src="https://www.politact.com/images/stories/200_India_and_Pakistan.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="200" align="right" />Faced with a challenging prospect in AfPak region, the US has initiated an intricate dialog process with the three key parties, which are distrustful of each other and the US. The US-Pakistan talks were held in March, followed by US-Afghanistan dialogue in May, and now this week comes the US-India strategic discussion.</p>
<p>To balance the competing vision of three countries with a history of mistrust is a daunting task to say the least. All three countries have at one point or the other felt short-changed at the hands of the US and by each other. PoliTact will be examining the strategic dialogue US is carrying out with Pakistan, Afghanistan and India in a series of articles, juxtaposing various positions and pointing to the intricacies involved.<br />
<span id="more-603"></span></p>
<p><strong>Analysis</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" src="https://www.politact.com/images/stories/250_India_and_Karzai(1).jpg" alt="" width="250" height="172" align="left" />The US and India talks begin this week and the focus most undoubtedly will be on the AfPak situation. India had protested strongly to its inclusion in the Af-Pak group initially, and ever since India has positioned itself as part of the solution not the problem. It is also important to note that two heavy-duty actors of the US AfPak policy, Robert Gates and Holbrooke, are going to be conspicuously missing from the dialogue due to &#8216;other engagements&#8217;.</p>
<p>The absence of Holbrooke eases India&#8217;s anxieties regarding giving any impression that there is anything afoot regarding the solution to Kashmir, which is a key Pakistani demand. At the same time, the Defense Department being represented by a delegate other than Secretary Gates must be comforting for the Pakistan generals. During US-Pakistan strategic talks it was General Kiyani who got the highest level of attention at the Defense Department and otherwise. US did not want to hurt its special relationship with the Pakistan Army at this pivotal time of the Afghan war. A high level meeting between the national security establishments of Pakistan and US is taking place in Islamabad next week.</p>
<ul>
<li>Afghanistan-Pakistan situation.</li>
<li> Reconstruction efforts in Afghanistan.</li>
<li>India&#8217;s Role in Afghanistan and in training of its Army and Security personal.</li>
<li>Counter-terrorism collaboration between the US and India particularly focused on threats from Pakistani Taliban and Punjabi and Kashmiri groups operating from Pakistan.</li>
<li> Convincing US to not supply Pakistan with advanced weaponry, as it will be used against it.</li>
<li> India&#8217;s help related to Iran&#8217;s nuclear ambitions and nuclear safety.</li>
<li> The role of China vis-a-vis India.</li>
<li> Garnering support for India&#8217;s position in the UN Security Council.</li>
<li> Expand trade between US and India.</li>
<li> Expand defense and technology ventures.</li>
</ul>
<p>India is concerned that the US and Pakistan might have struck a secret deal on the supply of nuclear technology to Pakistan during the strategic dialogue between the two countries. Former Indian Foreign Secretary Lalit Mansingh has warned the government to remain watchful despite America&#8217;s clear assertion that it has no intention of signing a nuclear deal with Pakistan in the near future. India is also skeptical that a greater role for Pakistan in Afghanistan would undermine India&#8217;s strategic interests in that country. The country had felt disillusioned after the US-Pakistan strategic dialogue and has been getting closer to Russia, its cold war ally. Furthermore, India is also concerned about the statement made by President Obama during his visit to China, which reinforced the G-2 vision of the world, and seems to entrust China with keeping order in the region.</p>
<p>PoliTact has previously examined the<a href="index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=266&amp;Itemid=9">US-Pakistan strategic dialogue</a> in a three part series, the premise of which was getting Pakistan&#8217;s support in resolving the Afghan Conflict. The assessment lead to the conclusion that US partnership with Pakistan has a more regional context. On the contrary, the above listed agenda items reveal US-India relationship has a more global dimension, and is backed by growing economy of India. As part of BRIC, India is increasingly positioning itself for global power status. In addition to US-India talks, PoliTact will next examine the US-Afghan strategic talks and the process of reconciliation initiated by President Karzai of Afghanistan.</p>
<p><strong>Tell Us What You Think</strong></p>
<p><a href="mailto:Feedback@politact.com" target="null">Feedback@politact.com</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://politact.com/us-india-dialogue-indias-concerns-over-the-us-pakistan-cooperation/">US-India Dialogue: India&#8217;s Concerns Over The US-Pakistan Cooperation</a> appeared first on <a href="https://politact.com">Politact</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://politact.com/us-india-dialogue-indias-concerns-over-the-us-pakistan-cooperation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
